|
|
July 25, 2000
For more information, contact
County Public Information Officer
David Wert
(909) 387-4082
dwert@cao.co.san-bernardino.ca.us
County to collect more than $6.5 million in settlements
More than
$6.5 million will soon be deposited into San Bernardino County coffers as the
result of a settlement the county Board of Supervisors reached today with
Norcal Waste Systems Inc. in a lawsuit filed by the county on June 8.
The
county today also entered into a separate agreement with the law firm of
Hinshaw & Culbertson, in which the firm will pay the county $25,000.
The
$6.561 million settlement with Norcal in itself represents a substantial stride
in the county’s effort to resolve the claims outlined in the June 8 lawsuit and
more than recoups the cost of the county’s investigation and litigation.
Former
Norcal/San Bernardino Inc. vice president Kenneth James Walsh and former Norcal
consultant Harry M. Mays, a former county administrative officer, are named and
remain as defendants in the county’s June 8 lawsuit. Norcal has also stated
that it intends to seek damages from Walsh and Mays, and today’s settlement
calls for the company to pay the county half of the net proceeds it recovers
from them.
“This is a major step forward in the county’s
effort to recover from this scandal and win back the people’s faith in county
government,” said Board of Supervisors Chairman Jon D. Mikels. “We have a lot
of work left to do, but these settlements show that the county is serious about
putting itself back on the right track.”
Norcal
has also agreed not to bid on a new county landfill contract for at least five
years. The county has agreed to dismiss Norcal from the suit and to give
Norcal/San Bernardino Inc. employees an opportunity to interview for jobs with
the new landfill operator or the county’s Waste System Division.
-MORE-
Norcal Settlement
Page 2
The
settlements with Norcal and Hinshaw & Culbertson come less than seven weeks
after the filing of the lawsuit, which could take at least two years to come to
trial. The length, expense and uncertainty inherent in this type of litigation
were among the factors that shaped the terms and timing of the county’s
settlement with Norcal.
The
agreement with Norcal was also crafted with the realization that the company
and the county must and will continue to work together to serve the residents
of San Bernardino County for about another 12 months as the search is conducted
for a new landfill operator.
The
settlement with Norcal covers the county’s action against both Norcal Waste
Systems Inc. and its local affiliate Norcal/San Bernardino Inc. The county
expects Norcal’s payment to be made within 30 days. The county acknowledges
Norcal’s extremely valuable cooperation and voluntary assistance.
The
county also settled with the law firm of Hinshaw and Culbertson. The firm has
agreed to pay the county $25,000 -- $15,000 to cover trips one of the firm’s
partners, John Larson, provided to various county employees and officials as
described in the Eighth Cause of Action in the county’s suit, and $10,000
toward the cost of the county’s internal investigation.
The
county has agreed to dismiss Hinshaw & Culbertson as a defendant in the
suit, and acknowledges that the law firm cooperated in the county’s
investigation and intends to cooperate further if necessary. The county also
agreed that the settlement would not be construed as an admission of wrongdoing
by Hinshaw & Culbertson. Larson was also named in the county’s lawsuit and
remains as a defendant.
Attorneys
for the county and Hinshaw & Culbertson began talking soon after the county
filed its lawsuit on June 8 in San Bernardino Superior Court. The suit named 22
defendants and stemmed from an internal county investigation undertaken in
December by the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrative Office.
The
county’s internal investigation has gone further than probes conducted by any
other agency to root out and expose the corruption that touched areas of county
government during James Hlawek’s four years as county administrative officer
ending in August 1998.
“Conducting
this internal investigation and following through with these lawsuits has been
very important for the county. It has allowed us to make positive changes and
make progress toward recovering our losses and restoring the public’s trust,”
Mikels said.
-30-